Case studies College Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Studies College - Case rent Example(citation omitted but mentioned in this case)Answer to Question 2 The duty to use reasonable armorial bearing in assigning the student to internship was not changed by the fact that the student arranged her own internship or practicum because this did not change the special relationship of student-institution imposed by the mandatory internship program of the check. In the other(a) hand, even if it is the student who arranged her own practicum, she still needs the approval of the school on the selected site. straggle of the duty of the school before approval is to determine the condition of the site whether it a conducive state of affairs and to warn the student of any predictable risks.Answer to Question 3 Aside from waivers to be sign by the parent/s of the student, another way that the institution could protect itself from liability is to have the employer, student, or school sign indemnity agreements or releases of liability which is app ropriate in the case of mandatory internship program. ... ) write up 2Bradshaw v. Rawlings612 F. 2d 135 (3d Cir. 1979)Answer to Question 1 It is a settled rule line from this case that college students, mostly 18 and above, are already adults, and the supervisory duty of an institution imposed by the doctrine in loco parentis no longer applies as the doctrine only applies to minors. Therefore, regulating the proceed of students and school-sponsored student activities outside the institution is no longer the business of the school. Once the school, in its own initiative, took the responsibility in regulating those activities, it created a special relationship imposing to itself a responsibility to protect the students from the foreseeable risks of the action. As a result, the failure to provide a reasonable care for the students in the conduct of school-sponsored employment will make the school liable for injuries that may be sustained by the students, if any, even if it is an o ff-campus activity.In this connection, the school could have better protected itself form the potential liability in situations involving student activity and the consumption of alcohol by limiting the coverage of the school policy prohibiting alcohol consumption during school or student activities within the school premises only. It is therefore suggested, that a change in the schools compose policy of regulating alcohol consumption by the students to be limited only on in-campus activities or in activities sponsored by the school. In cases of off-campus activities where an adviser is involved, it should be clarified before the activity as to what train of interaction should the adviser exercise. The type and level of